Since I've been here last, we have elected a new president. I have moved all of my assets out of the stock market and turned all my retirement into CDs and not because the stock market is failing, but because my entire life is about to be taxed so the more money I can have in untaxable things the better. I've also decided to get the gun I've always wanted. It will stay at my parents house for now, but after January 20th it will be hard and expensive to buy anything, especially guns.
So...I'm ready to get back to the real world and get caught up on interesting things. It seems as though an appeal has happened and personal comments are out for everyone to read...so the plot thickens.
I promise to be updating more!!
- Mood:
busy
When anything happens in my life, I always think it was for a reason that I'm in this situation. Karma...like I did something and now the world is crapping on me.
Thanks for listening
- Mood:
depressed
So...what about the verdict. I find myself finding reasons to be busy so I don't sit online constantly checking the news/Justia/certain threads to see if a verdict is in and I've missed it. It too seems that other people are beginning to "move on" so to speak when it comes to the trial as well. It seems as though people have talked in circles about both sides being right or wrong so much so that there isn't even any name calling discussion going on. It's just basically silence.
Where are we now? Have both sides taken time to realize that the petty bickering gets us nowhere, or are we to a point that nothing anyone says is going to be better than getting a verdict?
I still think we have months to wait on this. The judge is going to wait until the last minute to make a decision...it just shows how much is riding on this case. If it was easy we would know, if the case was as cut and dry as some make it seem, we would know. The fact is...we don't know...and I'm not sure how all of this waiting is beneficial to any side.
- Mood:
hopeful
He looks at different cases where people have gone after someone for copyright infringment.
He says this about the Lexicon Manuscript...is he right or wrong??
Derivative works represent a newly contentious area, particularly in defining the level of innovation or fresh creation. Warner Bros, Scholastic and J.K. Rowling are pursuing a case in New York against the publisher of a proposed Harry Potter Lexicon.
The Lexicon is based on an extant fan website that Rowling welcomed because, although it comprised lists of her spells and curses and other material drawn from her Harry Potter series of novels, it sought no commercial gain and may even have played a part in stimulating interest in her books.
However, once that same material - copied but rearranged and in places rewritten - was to be packaged and sold as a book, not only in the US but in other countries where the publisher had sold translation or reprint rights, the resulting work constituted, as most observers read the case, not fair use - where's the added creativity or innovation? - but rather an infringement of copyright and a denial of income from her creation that Rowling was entitled to.
There are other companions and encyclopaedias, for example to the work of Philip Pullman and Terry Pratchett, but these tend to be produced by the original publishers, or even co-authored by the original author, and therefore do not inhibit the commercial exploitation of the original copyright source by its creator.
Other derivative works that have been challenged using copyright have tended to be much more creative responses to existing works rather than so nakedly parasitical.
Lo's Diary comprises a retelling of Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita from the point of view of the girl, not the man. In this case, an out-of-court settlement was reached with the Nabokov estate, as also happened in the case of The Wind Done Gone, published by Houghton Mifflin, and Margaret Mitchell's estate, which was defending the interests of Gone with the Wind.
These settlements underline the commercial nature of copyright and the interests of estates. Many commentators believe that the well-publicised hesitations of Dimitri Nabokov to destroy, according to his father's wishes, the unfinished, unpublished work The Original of Laura are no more than an attempt to create interest in the book ahead of its eventual publication."
- Mood:
quixotic
It makes me think about transitions in life. I'm currently on a hunt for a new job in a bigger city so I can be out of the middle of nowhere and hang out with friends and enjoy life. Sometimes I wish that I just graduated from High School and had the ability to do anything and not knowing was ok. I would not want to give up my degrees though. oh well...me...rock...hard place!!
- Mood:
chipper
So what happens when a person comes in from a different country and has to work with the law and the unknown. A DEAD HORSE!!! Its sort of like reading the Bible. I read one passage and think God saves and the next person reads it and think God is unmerciful. Who is right...well...they both are. What is the point of talking about it over and over and over again? Nothing better to talk about I guess. It does make for some amusing reading I guess. I hear that someone has stolen the said horse, but is it really gone? I don't think so.
- Mood:
amused
So...I say this, I'm not choosing a side, and I'm not sitting on the fence either. There are facts that we do not know as the public and to pick a side I would need to judge...which is something I don't do. I'm also not going to try to repair the rift and spout off things about "can't we all just get along?" We are way past that point...the damage is done and people are hurt. Hugs for those people who are hurt. It isn't enough, but its all I have.
- Mood:
grateful
I wish you all a great day.
- Mood:
artistic
